linkedin
professionals-bio
PRACTICE AREAS

Blake Hunter Yagman

Partner

Blake Hunter Yagman is a Partner at Spiro Harrison & Nelson, where he leads the firm’s Data Privacy Litigation practice and contributes to the firm’s Antitrust and Unfair Competition practice.

Blake represents consumers, businesses, and municipalities in class action, complex, high-stakes litigation across a wide range of different industries, and advises clients seeking regulatory guidance, compliance, and litigation risk. Blake’s litigation experience includes the prosecution of antitrust, data privacy, and deceptive or unfair practices violations in courts across the country. Blake’s cases often address sophisticated, developing areas of law with novel allegations such as the unlawful use of sophisticated algorithms and software price manipulation across industries, the surreptitious collection and use of biometric and sensitive data, as well as the breach of confidential information due to cybersecurity lapses, malicious hacking incidents, and ransomware attacks.

Additionally, Blake has advanced procedural knowledge of class action, complex, and multi-district litigation practice before numerous federal and state courts, and the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Blake has used an innovative repertoire of procedural skills to the benefit of his clients, including numerous successful oppositions of the use of mandatory and binding arbitration clauses and class action waivers, and has extensive experience guiding teams of lawyers, as well as leading hearings and oral arguments while participating at trial.

Currently, Blake serves in various mentorship roles for law students and young attorneys. He has recently guest lectured on complex litigation and legal ethics topics at the University of Miami and Hofstra University and has provided commentary for law school symposium panels at Yeshiva University’s Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law. Additionally, Blake is a member of the Theodore Roosevelt Association and of the conservationist society called Friends of Sagamore Hill, and a member of the LGBT Bar Association of New York.

Prior to law school, Blake wrote for numerous sports publications on legal issues and clerked for the Honorable Lawrence A. Schwartz (Ret.) in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida. Blake has had roles in federal legislation, campaign organizing, and the sports industry, having worked in both houses of the United States Congress as well as for the former President of the United States. Blake also has unique private sector experience, having been employed as a student assistant football coach for the University of Miami Hurricanes and as a legal intern for several well-known sports agencies. Blake’s journalistic work has been cited in law review articles at the University of Chicago, Vanderbilt, Villanova, University of Cincinnati, Hofstra University, and Seton Hall; and Blake provided testimony to the United States Senate’s 113th Congress.

Blake received his Juris Doctor from Yeshiva University’s Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law with a concentration in Intellectual Property and Data Law; at Cardozo, Blake wrote his symposium paper in 2017, “When the Bully Takes the Bully Pulpit,” about the limits of defamation laws when elected and political figures use social media. Prior to law school, he received his Bachelor of Arts in History from the University of Miami.

Blake is admitted to practice law in the State of New York and is pending admission in the District of Columbia. Blake also has active federal court admissions in the Southern District of New York, the Eastern District of New York, the Northern District of Illinois, the District of Colorado, the District of Columbia and District of Maryland. Blake has a forthcoming application for admission to the Commonwealth of Virginia.

Representative Matters
  • In re American Airlines/JetBlue Antitrust Litigation (Eastern District of New York) - previously appointed as part of an interim co-lead counsel team representing direct purchasers of airline tickets impacted by alleged anticompetitive conduct by two major airlines flying out of four major airlines in the northeast United States.
  • In re Zeta Global Data Privacy Litigation (Southern District of New York) - currently appointed as part of an executive committee representing a putative class of over one hundred million Americans who allegedly had their data collected unlawfully.
  • Lanham v. Major League Baseball Advanced Media (Southern District of New York) - currently representing purchasers of sporting event and concert tickets who were allegedly victims of cybersecurity breaches on a digital ticketing platform which resulted in ticket theft.
  • In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation (Eastern District of Pennsylvania) - represented direct purchasers and contributed to a trial team as part of the prosecution of a price-fixing conspiracy by major egg producers.
  • In re Google Play Consumer Antitrust Litigation (Northern District of California) - represented direct purchasers of Android mobile applications and in-application purchases impacted by alleged monopolistic conduct.
  • In re Archery Products Antitrust Litigation (District of Colorado) - currently representing direct purchasers of archery equipment and products impacted by an alleged price-fixing conspiracy by distributors and retailers.
  • In re Deere & Company Repair Services Antitrust Litigation (Northern District of Illinois) - represented direct purchaser owners of John Deere tractors impacted by alleged monopolistic conduct related to the right-to-repair those tractors.
  • In re California Gasoline Spot Market Antitrust Litigation (Northern District of California) - represented California indirect purchasers of gasoline impacted by anticompetitive and collusive conduct by gasoline spot market traders.
  • In re Apple Inc. Smartphone Antitrust Litigation (District of New Jersey) - represented indirect purchasers of smartphones impacted by monopolistic conduct.
  • Caccuri, et al. v. Sony Interactive Entertainment, Inc. (Northern District of California) - represented direct purchasers of downloadable Sony PlayStation video games impacted by monopolistic conduct.
  • Gerber, et al. v. Twitter, Inc. (Northern District of California) - previously appointed as part of an interim co-lead counsel team representing victims (in a case of first impression) of a 211+ million person data breach that occurred on a major social media platform.
  • Doe v. GoodRx, Inc. (Northern District of California) - previously appointed as part of an executive committee team representing users of an online drug discount card website whose protected health information was alleged to have been packaged and sold to major technology companies.
  • In re CityMD Data Privacy Litigation (District of New Jersey) - previously appointed as one of three interim co-lead counsel representing urgent care clinic patients who had the protected health information provided to a website which was alleged to have been packaged and sold to major technology companies.
  • Boone, et al. v. Snap, Inc. (Illinois State Court) - represented minor plaintiffs in the State of Illinois whose biometric information was allegedly collected unlawfully by a social media application.
  • Veiga, et al. v. Respondus, Inc. (Illinois State Court) - represented college students in the State of Illinois whose biometric information was allegedly collected unlawfully by a computerized test proctoring system.
  • Gross, et al. v Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corporation (Southern District of New York) - represented visitors (in a case of first impression) to a major sports and concert arena whose biometric information was collected unlawfully upon entry.
  • Ajzenman, et al. v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, et al. (Central District of California) - represented sports fans who sought refunds for purchased tickets to professional baseball games for the 2020 COVID-19 affected season.
Admissions
  • State of New York
  • United States District Court of the Southern District of New York
  • United States District Court of the Eastern District of New York
  • United States District Court of the Northern District of Illinois
  • United States District Court of Colorado
  • United States District Court of Maryland
  • United States District Court for the District of Columbia